Velvet Grand vs Hammersmith Pro

Hammersmith Pro wins on brilliant, articulate tone; Velvet Grand trades some clarity for a distinctive, warm character.

Velvet Grand offers a velvety, warm sound with natural room presence. This character, while unique, can make Velvet Grand less suitable for cutting through dense pop mixes. Many users praise its decay and the intimate hammer sounds from the close mic.

Hammersmith Pro delivers a bright, sparkling tone with excellent responsiveness. Its 21 velocity layers create a wide dynamic range. This high fidelity comes at the cost of a large file size and demanding system resources, creating workflow friction for some users.

Choose Velvet Grand if a warm, natural room sound is paramount.

Choose Hammersmith Pro if you require a brilliant, articulate piano with broad dynamic range.

Products Compared

Insights from Real-World Use

Velvet Grand

  • The ribbon mic gives Velvet Grand a nice, velvety sound.
  • Velvet Grand's decay provides good presence and life.
  • Close mic provides essential hammer sound and 'bite' for Velvet Grand.
  • Velvet Grand is great for cinematic but not for cutting through a pop mix.
  • Appreciation for the natural room sound in Velvet Grand recordings.

Hammersmith Pro

  • The 21 velocity layers and sound capture are excellent, indicating a well-crafted library.
  • The piano offers nice responsiveness, dynamic range, and playability due to 21 velocity layers.
  • The piano has a nice sparkle and sounds good even without effects.
  • I have downloaded the free version and am very impressed. I have added the full version to my "wish list of purchases". It is currently sitting right next to Pianoteq V7. I try to keep my piano librar
  • Overload on my PC. Especially when playing this instruments inside Daw while we recording the screen.

Explore PianoVST