New York L 1991 vs 300 Grand Compact
New York L 1991 wins on character and specific tonal preference; 300 Grand Compact offers more immediate utility with fewer performance concerns. New York L 1991 provides a modern, distinct sound that users strongly prefer. Its full versions can suffer from performance issues, limiting its consistent use.
300 Grand Compact delivers strong sound quality and playability right out of the box. Its dry sound offers flexibility for reverb customization.
Choose New York L 1991 if you prioritize a specific sound and can tolerate potential resource demands. Choose 300 Grand Compact if dependable performance and sound-shaping flexibility are more critical.
Products Compared
Insights from Real-World Use
New York L 1991
- These pianos have LOTS of character. And now that the Bösendorfer 170VC is out (and there is a sale), I just couldn't resist.
- Enjoys the unique character of the piano sound.
- Strong preference for the 1991 plugin.
- All the Boz plugins have great dynamic response, at least for the way I play and the controllers I use. The only issue I’ve found is that the Tone knob is too drastic for my taste and is basically onl
- this piano sounds INCREDIBLE... it was only $29? Insane. I love Boz Digital plugins and this is no exception.
300 Grand Compact
- The 300 Grand Compact's dry, tight sound allows flexible reverb customization.
- 300 Grand provides so many options and mic perspectives along with a very dynamic touch response.
- I use the Steinway D almost all the time over the C7 for recording ballads. I like it a lot! Now with this CFX.... I love how its kind of in between both the Steinway and C7. Always good to have optio
- 300 Grand provides so many options and mic perspectives along with a very dynamic touch response.
- I use the Steinway D almost all the time over the C7 for recording ballads. I like it a lot! Now with this CFX.... I love how its kind of in between both the Steinway and C7. Always good to have optio